Updating the omeract filter: Discrimination and feasibility

O�stergaard, Mikkel; Landew�, Robert B.; D'Agostino, Maria Antonietta; O�stergaard, Mikkel; Wells, George; Beaton, Dorcas E.; Tugwell, Peter; Boers, Maarten; Kirwan, John R.; Bingham, Clifton O.; Boonen, Annelies; Brooks, Peter; Conaghan, Philip G.; Dougados, Maxime; Furst, Daniel E.; Gossec, Laure; Guillemin, Francis; Helliwell, Philip; Hewlett, Sarah; Kvien, Tore K.; March, Lyn; Mease, Philip J.; Simon, Lee; Singh, Jasvinder A.; Strand, Vibeke; Van Der Heijde, D�sir�e M.

doi:10.3899/jrheum.131311

Updating the omeract filter: Discrimination and feasibility

O�stergaard, Mikkel; Landew�, Robert B.; D'Agostino, Maria Antonietta; O�stergaard, Mikkel; Wells, George; Beaton, Dorcas E.; Tugwell, Peter; Boers, Maarten; Kirwan, John R.; Bingham, Clifton O.; Boonen, Annelies; Brooks, Peter; Conaghan, Philip G.; Dougados, Maxime; Furst, Daniel E.; Gossec, Laure; Guillemin, Francis; Helliwell, Philip; Hewlett, Sarah; Kvien, Tore K.; March, Lyn; Mease, Philip J.; Simon, Lee; Singh, Jasvinder A.; Strand, Vibeke; Van Der Heijde, D�sir�e M.

Authors

Mikkel O�stergaard

Robert B. Landew�

Maria Antonietta D'Agostino

Mikkel O�stergaard

George Wells

Dorcas E. Beaton

Peter Tugwell

Maarten Boers

John R. Kirwan

Clifton O. Bingham

Annelies Boonen

Peter Brooks

Philip G. Conaghan

Maxime Dougados

Daniel E. Furst

Laure Gossec

Francis Guillemin

Philip Helliwell

Sarah Hewlett Sarah.Hewlett@uwe.ac.uk

Tore K. Kvien

Lyn March

Philip J. Mease

Lee Simon

Jasvinder A. Singh

Vibeke Strand

D�sir�e M. Van Der Heijde

Abstract

The " Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. " Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants. © 2014. All rights reserved.

Citation

OØstergaard, M., Landewé, R. B., D'Agostino, M. A., OØstergaard, M., Wells, G., Beaton, D. E., …Van Der Heijde, D. M. (2014). Updating the omeract filter: Discrimination and feasibility. Journal of Rheumatology, 41(5), 1005-1010. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131311

Journal Article Type	Article
Publication Date	Jan 1, 2014
Journal	Journal of Rheumatology
Print ISSN	0315-162X
Electronic ISSN	1499-2752
Publisher	Journal of Rheumatology
Peer Reviewed	Peer Reviewed
Volume	41
Issue	5
Pages	1005-1010
DOI	https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131311
Keywords	outcome measures in rheumatology, feasibility, outcome and process assessment, discrimination
Public URL	https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/818631
Publisher URL	http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131311