Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children-the EcLiPSE study: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Bacon, Naomi E.A.; Lyttle, Mark; Gamble, Carrol; Messahel, Shrouk; Hickey, Helen; Iyer, Anand; Woolfall, Kerry; Humphreys, Amy; Roper, Louise; Babl, Franz E.; Dalziel, Stuart R.; Ryan, Mary; Appleton, Richard E.

Emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children-the EcLiPSE study: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Thumbnail


Authors

Naomi E.A. Bacon

Mark Lyttle

Carrol Gamble

Shrouk Messahel

Helen Hickey

Anand Iyer

Kerry Woolfall

Amy Humphreys

Louise Roper

Franz E. Babl

Stuart R. Dalziel

Mary Ryan

Richard E. Appleton



Abstract

© The Author(s). 2017. Background: Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is the most common life-threatening neurological emergency in childhood. These children are also at risk of significant morbidity, with acute and chronic impact on the family and the health and social care systems. The current recommended first-choice, second-line treatment in children aged 6 months and above is intravenous phenytoin (fosphenytoin in the USA), although there is a lack of evidence for its use and it is associated with significant side effects. Emerging evidence suggests that intravenous levetiracetam may be effective as a second-line agent for CSE, and fewer adverse effects have been described. This trial therefore aims to determine whether intravenous phenytoin or levetiracetam is more effective, and safer, in treating childhood CSE. Methods/design: This is a phase IV, multi-centre, parallel group, randomised controlled, open-label trial. Following treatment for CSE with first-line treatment, children with ongoing seizures are randomised to receive either phenytoin (20 mg/kg, maximum 2 g) or levetiracetam (40 mg/kg, maximum 2.5 g) intravenously. The primary outcome measure is the cessation of all visible signs of CSE as determined by the treating clinician. Secondary outcome measures include the need for further anti-seizure medications or rapid sequence induction for ongoing CSE, admission to critical care areas, and serious adverse reactions. Patients are recruited without prior consent, with deferred consent sought at an appropriate time for the family. The primary analysis will be by intention-to-treat. The primary outcome is a time to event outcome and a sample size of 140 participants in each group will have 80% power to detect an increase in CSE cessation rates from 60% to 75%. Our total sample size of 308 randomised and treated participants will allow for 10% loss to follow-up. Discussion: This clinical trial will determine whether phenytoin or levetiracetam is more effective as an intravenous second-line agent for CSE, and provide evidence for management recommendations. In addition, this trial will also provide data on which of these therapies is safer in this setting.

Citation

Bacon, N. E., Lyttle, M., Gamble, C., Messahel, S., Hickey, H., Iyer, A., …Appleton, R. E. (2017). Emergency treatment with levetiracetam or phenytoin in status epilepticus in children-the EcLiPSE study: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 18(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2010-8

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 1, 2017
Online Publication Date Jun 19, 2017
Publication Date Jan 1, 2017
Deposit Date Jun 26, 2017
Publicly Available Date Jul 19, 2017
Journal Trials
Print ISSN 1745-6215
Electronic ISSN 1745-6215
Publisher BioMed Central
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 18
Issue 1
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2010-8
Keywords paediatric, status epilepticus, levetiracetam, phenytoin
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/885718
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2010-8