@conference { , title = {Analysing change in urban political leadership: Does introducing a mayoral form of governance make a difference?}, abstract = {The reform of the institutions of urban political leadership is often put forward as a means to improve city governance. Introducing alternative arrangements for decision-making within a municipality can redistribute the powers and responsibilities of different actors within a system of urban governance. These changes usually aim to improve the quality of governance by improving such matters as representation, accountability, and public service responsiveness. In 2012, in an unusual move, the citizens of Bristol, UK, decided to abolish the former leader-and cabinet system of decision-making and replace it with a mayoral form of governance – one headed by a directly elected mayor. This paper addresses the question: Does introducing a mayoral form of governance make a difference? With reference to both UK and US literature on city leadership, the paper assesses whether a change in emphasis pertaining to leadership style and/or leadership tasks can be detected in Bristol. The analysis draws on data collected both before and after the introduction of the new system and includes data from surveys of different actors in the city. In doing so we explore debates around the changing nature of urban leadership, and draw initial conclusions that should be of interest to those concerned to enhance the quality of urban governance.}, conference = {Urban Affairs Annual Conference}, publicationstatus = {Unpublished}, url = {https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/835965}, keyword = {Centre for Sustainable Planning and Environments, city leadership, directly elected mayors, local government, Bristol}, year = {2015}, author = {Sweeting, David and Hambleton, Robin} }