@article { , title = {Updating the omeract filter: Discrimination and feasibility}, abstract = {The " Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. " Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants. © 2014. All rights reserved.}, doi = {10.3899/jrheum.131311}, eissn = {1499-2752}, issn = {0315-162X}, issue = {5}, journal = {Journal of Rheumatology}, pages = {1005-1010}, publicationstatus = {Published}, publisher = {Journal of Rheumatology}, url = {https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/818631}, volume = {41}, keyword = {Centre for Health and Clinical Research, outcome measures in rheumatology, feasibility, outcome and process assessment, discrimination}, year = {2014}, author = {OØstergaard, Mikkel and Landewé, Robert B. and D'Agostino, Maria Antonietta and OØstergaard, Mikkel and Wells, George and Beaton, Dorcas E. and Tugwell, Peter and Boers, Maarten and Kirwan, John R. and Bingham, Clifton O. and Boonen, Annelies and Brooks, Peter and Conaghan, Philip G. and Dougados, Maxime and Furst, Daniel E. and Gossec, Laure and Guillemin, Francis and Helliwell, Philip and Hewlett, Sarah and Kvien, Tore K. and March, Lyn and Mease, Philip J. and Simon, Lee and Singh, Jasvinder A. and Strand, Vibeke and Van Der Heijde, Désirée M.} }