@article { , title = {Priorities for social science and humanities research on the challenges of moving beyond animal-based food systems}, abstract = {Increasingly high-profile research is being undertaken into the socio-environmental challenges associated with the over-production and consumption of food from animals. Transforming food systems to mitigate climate change and hidden hunger, ensure food security and good health all point to reducing animal-based foods as a key lever. Moving beyond animal-based food systems is a societal grand challenge requiring coordinated international research by the social sciences and humanities. A ‘selective openness’ to this range of disciplines has been observed within multi-discipline research programmes designed to address societal grand challenges including those concerned with the sustainability of food systems, inhibiting the impact of social sciences and humanities. Further, existing research on animal-based foods within these disciplines is largely dispersed and focused on particular parts of food systems. Inspired by the ‘Sutherland Method’ this paper discusses the results of an iterative research prioritisation process carried out to enhance capacity, mutual understanding and impact amongst European social sciences and humanities researchers. The process produced 15 research questions from an initial list of 100 and classified under the following five themes: (1) debating and visioning food from animals; (2) transforming agricultural spaces; (3) framing animals as food; (4) eating practices and identities; and (5) governing transitions beyond animal-based food systems. These themes provide an important means of making connections between research questions that invite and steer research on key challenges in moving beyond animal-based food systems. The themes also propose loci for future transdisciplinary research programmes that join researchers from the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities and stakeholders from beyond academia to develop cooperative research and implementation initiatives. The experiences gained from the prioritisation process draw attention to the value of spending time to discuss and collaboratively steer research enquiry into emergent and controversial matters of concern. Fundamental, ethical questions around the continuation or complete cessation of the use of animals for food was a key tension. The positioning of research towards these questions affects not only the framing of the research area but also the partners with whom the research can be carried out and for whom it may be of benefit.}, doi = {10.1057/s41599-021-00714-z}, eissn = {2662-9992}, issn = {2662-9992}, issue = {1}, journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences Communications}, publicationstatus = {Published}, publisher = {Springer Nature [academic journals on nature.com]}, url = {https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/7096914}, volume = {8}, keyword = {Centre for Public Health and Wellbeing, Formerly Health & Social Sciences, Geography, Sociology}, year = {2021}, author = {Morris, Carol and Kaljonen, Minna and Aavik, Kadri and Balázs, Bálint and Cole, Matthew and Coles, Ben and Efstathiu, Sophia and Fallon, Tracey and Foden, Mike and Giraud, Eva Haifa and Goodman, Mike and Kershaw, Eleanor Hadley and Helliwell, Richard and Hobson-West, Pru and Häyry, Matti and Jallinoja, Piia and Jones, Mat and Kaarlenkaski, Taija and Laihonen, Maarit and Lähteenmäki-Uutela, Anu and Kupsala, Saara and Lonkila, Annika and Martens, Lydia and McGlacken, Renelle and Mylan, Josephine and Niva, Mari and Roe, Emma and Twine, Richard and Vinnari, Markus and White, Richard} }