@article { , title = {Lesbian and gay parents on talk shows: resistance or collusion in heterosexism?}, abstract = {In this paper we explore popular television talk show debates about lesbian and gay parents. We show that the heterosexist framing of these debates compels lesbian and gay parents and their supporters to produce defensive and apologetic arguments that normalise lesbian and gay families. Lesbian and gay parents end up reinforcing the legitimacy of anti-lesbian/gay fears in the very act of demonstrating that they are groundless. We identify six themes in pro-lesbian/gay discourse on talk shows: (i) ‘I’m not a lesbian/gay parent’; (ii) ‘we’re just the family next door’; (iii) ‘love makes a family’; (iv) ‘god made Adam and Steve’; (v) children as ‘proof ’; and (vi) the benefits of growing up in a lesbian/gay family. Our analysis focuses on the broad, ideological functions and effects of these themes. We conclude the paper by outlining an alternative agenda for talk show debates about lesbian and gay issues.}, doi = {10.1191/1478088704qp014oa}, issn = {1478-0887}, issue = {3}, journal = {Qualitative Research in Psychology}, pages = {195-217}, publicationstatus = {Published}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis (Routledge)}, url = {https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/1064431}, volume = {1}, keyword = {Centre for Appearance Research, Social Science Research Group, Formerly Health & Social Sciences, heterosexism, lesbian and gay parenting, normalisation, talk shows}, year = {2004}, author = {Clarke, Victoria and Kitzinger, Celia} }